Tuesday, November 27, 2007

On Being Transformed

This weekend in the message from church on Sunday and in conversation with some people whom are close to me, and whom I respect their direction, I have come again to be reminded of something that is very simple, but yet overlooked so very often in our lives as believers in Christ.

Often times we want to take our lives, our desires, our families, our friends, and definitely our plans...and try our best to make them good or set things in motion the way we would want them. Then after we have put our own plans into action...we want God to bless that...or more prudently, we want to put God into the plan we set in motion. Now, I'm not judging the 'rightness' or 'wrongness' of our plans in life...as I'm sure that all people do what they believe is right...and do what they believe is doing their best. So, those things aren't in question.

Prov 14:12
There is a way which seems right to a man,
But its end is the way of death.

But I think that real 'success' in managing life, and having abundant life (as well as avoiding tons of sins and snares), comes from putting God first in our lives...as a real Lord of who we are. Putting him in front of our families, our friendships, our work, our hobbies, our desires, our hopes, our dreams, and our plans. If we do this...and get our value, worth, and love from Him first...then that overflows into the rest of the pieces in our lives. And in terms of plans...it may open our eyes to what plans God would like us to be part of...and perhaps that would change our minds about our own plans in many things. Of course if we don't do things that way...then the likelihood of us not being fixated on our own ways and plan is pretty much nil.

Prov 1:7
The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge...

Everything trickles down from there....our acknowledgment of God is the beginning, not the middle, and not an afterthought to try to get blessed.

John 4:14
Indeed, the water I give them will become in them a spring of water welling up to eternal life.

And I don't believe that just means myopically 'being saved'. This is the outpouring for us to live this life in His Kingdom...even here.

So...when we think that life is not good...or that life is taking control of us...or that we are just being swept up in things...or that we must be doing something wrong. Perhaps we have, indeed. Perhaps we are merely reaping the consequences of the life, or plans, or ways, or even sins...that we chose. It doesn't seem so 'mere' after you realize that you've been living on your own, only inviting Jesus in when it is convenient for you, or when you are ready to share your plans with him. Put him first...and let him guide your paths. Not the other way around.

Anyway, my friends...this is what I've been learning with pain in my own life and with 'my' plans. We to be transformed by Him, and take all thoughts captive, and be blameless in our actions, and express love that points people back to Christ, not away from Him.

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Reposts from Greg Boyd - "The Worst Heresy"

The following are reposts of some entries on Greg Boyd's blog, starting with a picture of Jesus washing the feet of prominent political figures of our time that stirred up a lot of controversy.

Evan






(original link to picture)




I'd like you to consider something.

The New Testament defines agape love by pointing us to Jesus Christ (I Jn 3:16). To love someone is treat them like Jesus has treated you -- dying for you while you were yet a sinner.

The New Testament tells us that the command to love (= looking like Jesus Christ) is the greatest command, encompassing all others ( Lk 10:27; Rom. 13:8, 10; Ja 2:8). It tells us everything else in the law hangs on our fulfilling this law (Mt 22:27-40). It tells us that love is to be placed above all else (Col 3:14; I Pet 4:8). It tells us that everything we do is to be done in love (I Cor. 16:14). It tells us that nothing has any Kingdom value apart from love, however impressive things may be in and of themselves (I Cor. 13:1-3). It tells us that the only thing that ultimately matters is faith energized by love (Gal. 5:6). And it tells us that this love is to be given to all people at all times, including our enemies (Lk 6:27-35) . Indeed, Jesus makes loving our enemies the pre-condition for being considered "children of the Most High, because he is kind to the ungrateful and wicked" (Lk 6:35). We're to "be merciful as your Father in heaven is merciful" (Lk 6:36).

This is simply what it means to look like Jesus Christ.

Now follow me: If love is to be placed above all else, if everything else is to be considered worthless apart from love and if everything hangs on fulfilling this one law, how can we avoid the conclusion that refusing to love even our enemies is the worst heresy imaginable? To miss this all important point renders whatever other truth we may possess worthless.

In this light, we have to ask, who is the worse heretic: Michael Servetus who was burned alive for denying that the Son of God was eternal, or Calvin who had him burned alive? Burning someone alive is not loving them, doing good to them or blessing them (Lk 6:27-28, 35). And without love, whatever other truth Calvin may have been defending becomes worthless. If we're thinking biblically, how can we avoid concluding that Calvin was not only a worse heretic than Servetus, but that he committed the greatest heresy imaginable?

But I don't mean to pick on Calvin. Throughout church history from the time of Augustine (who first justified persecution in Jesus' name), millions of people were tortured and murdered for their alleged heresy. Yet, if we're thinking biblically, how can we avoid the conclusion that the Church that carried out this barbarism in Jesus' name was far more heretical than all the heretics it persecuted?

Ironically, while millions were tortured and murdered for having "heretical" views on things like baptism and communion, there's not one episode I know of throughout church history of anyone so much as having their hand slapped because they lacked love.

Yet, everything hangs on this.

Finally, while we have an obligation to distinguish between what is and is not the Kingdom of God, we have to carefully guard against self-righteousness. Rather than feeling righteous by contrasting ourselves with Calvin or any other Christian persecutors from the past, we have to ask ourselves: Are we guilty of the worst heresy imaginable? Do we do everything in love? Do we place love above all other considerations?

Do we love Osama Bin Laden?

Think about it.

Live in love, as Christ loved you and gave his life for you (Eph 5:1-2).

-- Greg Boyd (from "The Worst Heresy Imaginable!")




The last two blogs have generated a bit of a stir. Good! If what I’m saying about the centrality of Calvary-looking love is right, we need a major paradigm shift on how we view orthodoxy – which in turn should effect who we see as the “heroes” of orthodoxy.

My contention is that, while we can and should continue to appreciate the theological insights of people who were involved in torturing and killing people, we should not regard them as heroes of orthodoxy – for they were guilty of the worst heresy imaginable. If we continue to esteem killers as heroes, we can’t help but have our vision of the beautiful Kingdom polluted. Of course, none of our heroes are perfect. But I would think, at the very least, they should not be guilty of the worst heresy imaginable. If we wouldn't make a person who denied the Trinity a hero of orthodoxy, we shouldn't make anyone who kills in Jesus' name a hero either.

A few have questioned my claim that Calvin was responsible for Michael Servetus’ murder. One person argued that Calvin actually tried to stop his execution.

It’s true that Calvin didn’t want Servetus burned alive. He advocated for him to be beheaded. But there’s no reputable Calvin scholar I know of who denies Calvin wanted him executed.

Calvin himself had told his colleague Farel that if Servetus ever returned to Geneva, he’d “never permit him to depart alive, provided my authority be of any avail.” After the burning, Calvin said, "Many people have accused me of such ferocious cruelty that (they allege) I would like to kill again the man I have destroyed. Not only am I indifferent to their comments, but I rejoice in the fact that they spit in my face." Elsewhere Calvin said, "Whoever shall now contend that it is unjust to put heretics and blasphemers to death will knowingly and willingly incur their very guilt.”

Even Calvin’s staunchest defenders (such as B. B. Warfield) grant that Calvin was ultimately responsible for Servetus’ death. They simply minimize his culpability by saying he was “a man of his times.”

I regard this response to be very weak. Jesus and the early Christians lived in very violent times yet refused to conform to them. And there were many Christians during Calvin's time (the 16th century) who argued that the use of violence is inconsistent with the teachings of the New Testament – including Calvin’s former friend Sebastian Castellio and all the early Anabaptists. Not only this, but by most accounts, Calvin’s enthusiasm for the use of force to uphold what he regarded as right doctrine and behavior went far beyond most other religious leaders of his time – including, very often, his own Geneva council.

For those who are interested in doing further reading on this topic, here’s a few works I’ve read that I’d recommend:

* Roland Bainton, The Hunted Heretic. I was fascinated with Servetus when I was at Yale and had a number of talks with the elderly Bainton on his book during this time. This man was a walking encyclopedia on the Reformation. (As a side note, he was close to 90 when I met him, yet was sharp as a whip and rode a bike all around town!)

*John Fulton, Michael Servetus: Humanist and Martyr. An excellent overview of Servetus’ life, thought and death (which Fulton sees as a martyrdom)

*Perez Zagorin, How the Idea of Religious Toleration Came to the West. A very scholarly work that includes a good section on how public outrage toward Calvin's murder of Servetus contributed to Christianity finally become a religion that tolerated religious differences. Sebastian Castellio played a major role in creating this outrage.

*Bernard Cottret, Calvin: A Biography. Argues that Calvin was directly responsible for 38 executions in Geneva (other scholars argue he was at least indirectly responsible for as many as 58).

*Robert M. Kingdon, Adultery and Divorce in Calvin's Geneva. Kingdon is one of the foremost scholars in the world on Geneva under Calvin. This book, published by Harvard Press, relies entirely on original sources and presents an incredibly harsh picture of Geneva under Calvin’s rule. For example, a number of children were imprisoned, tortured and even executed for being disrespectful to parents (though I'm not certain I got this information from this work).

My point in all this is not to pick on Calvin. His defenders are right in at least one respect: Almost all segments of Christianity were killing enemies at this time, and Christianity had been engaged in this sort of barbarism for a thousand years by the time Calvin came on the scene. Tragically, Calvin's murder is not at all unique in the history of this religion. My point is rather that we need to clearly distinguish the Kingdom of God from all such barbarism. And to do this, we must stop making heroes of Christians who killed enemies rather than loving and serving them, as Jesus taught.

-- Greg Boyd (from "Did Calvin Kill Servetus?")

Sunday, November 11, 2007

Blog Tag - albums I'd recommend

I've been blog-tagged by Brooks Hanes to list 3 albums I'd recommend purchasing, if you don't already have them. So, here is my picks (with links!), brother man:

1. "Mute Math" by Mute Math - These guys are pretty amazing. They mingle hard-edged pop with loops and even a bit of reggae, and come out with an album where I am genuinely interested in pretty much every track on the disc. A couple of the guys are from the Springfield, MO area (where I presently live), and the others from New Orleans and Texas. Their shows are excellent...so not only would I recommend their CD...but also their concerts.

2. "Dwell" by Vineyard Music (Casey Corum, Robbie Reider, Sheri Keller, Dave Fife, Jessica Ketola) - This is one of the single most influential recordings in modern worship for perhaps the last 10 years. This CD may not seem any different on the surface than any other worship music recording, but it is aimed at regaining a connection to arranging music that is pleasing as a listening and a worshipping experience (which unfortunately most worship music is cliche and not especially interesting or talented). This aims at regaining a connection to the rest of the music world.

3. "Full Attention" by Jeremy Riddle - Another heavily influential disc in this change of direction with worship music to be concerned about arranging, engineering and using musicianship to engage people in worship. This man has an amazing heart and honesty toward God.

So, there you all go! I hope you enjoy.